The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the Education System

Authors

  • Boburbek Mirxojiddinovich Nurmatov Senior lecturer at the Department of the Institute of Information and Communication Technologies and Military Communications of the University of Military Security and Defense of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Author

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, education technology, large language models, personalized learning, academic integrity, AI literacy, ChatGPT, digital transformation, higher education, pedagogy

Abstract

The article examines the multidimensional impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on the modern education system. Drawing on recent scholarly literature and policy documents, the study analyzes how large language models such as GPT, Gemini and Claude are reshaping teaching, learning, assessment, curriculum design and educational administration. The principal application domains of the technology are identified, including personalized learning, intelligent tutoring, automated content generation, formative assessment, language acquisition and inclusive education. The article argues that, when integrated thoughtfully, GenAI can enhance learning outcomes, reduce teacher workload and democratize access to high-quality educational resources, while simultaneously raising serious concerns regarding academic integrity, factual reliability, algorithmic bias, data privacy, the digital divide and cognitive over-reliance. The study concludes that the educational value of GenAI depends not on the technology itself but on the pedagogical, ethical and policy frameworks within which it is deployed.

NINE muqovasi

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 11 (2026): November 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 The author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the Education System. (2026). New Innovations in National Education, 3(11). https://reandpub.uz/nine/article/view/1403

References

[1] Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N. et al. Attention Is All You Need // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017. Vol. 30. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762.

[2] Brown T. B., Mann B., Ryder N. et al. Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020. Vol. 33. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165.

[3] Bommasani R., Hudson D. A., Adeli E. et al. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models // arXiv preprint. 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258.

[4] UNESCO. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2023.

[5] Kasneci E., Sessler K., Küchemann S. et al. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education // Learning and Individual Differences. 2023. Vol. 103. Art. 102274.

[6] Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V. I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 16. Art. 39.

[7] Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.

[8] Selwyn N. Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.

[9] Rudolph J., Tan S., Tan S. ChatGPT: Bullshit Spinner or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? // Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. 2023. Vol. 6, No. 1. P. 342–363.

[10] Luckin R., Holmes W., Griffiths M., Forcier L. B. Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson, 2016.