Gender in Contemporary International Relations: Structural Inequality, Feminist Critique, and the Politics of Global Governance

Авторы

  • Aziza Matlubovna Radjabova UWED International Relations department Associate Professor, PhD Автор

Ключевые слова:

International relations, gender equality, feminist international relations, global governance, patriarchy, political representation, economic inequality, unpaid care work, gender-based violence, security studies, Sustainable Development Goals

Аннотация

This article examines the role of gender in contemporary international relations, focusing on the persistent structural inequalities that continue to shape women’s participation in global political, economic, and social processes. Despite the formal recognition of gender equality within international normative frameworks, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 5, its practical implementation remains uneven across regions and institutional contexts. Grounded in feminist international relations theory, the study argues that global governance structures are still largely informed by patriarchal assumptions embedded in traditional understandings of power, security, and rationality. These assumptions contribute to the systematic underrepresentation of women in decision-making institutions and reinforce gendered hierarchies within international political and economic systems. The article further analyzes key dimensions of gender inequality, including political exclusion, economic disparities, unpaid care work, limited access to education and healthcare, and heightened vulnerability to gender-based violence and armed conflict. It demonstrates that these factors are structurally interconnected and collectively sustain gender asymmetries in global development outcomes.

Опубликован

2026-11-02

Выпуск

Раздел

Articles

Как цитировать

Gender in Contemporary International Relations: Structural Inequality, Feminist Critique, and the Politics of Global Governance. (2026). New Innovations in National Education, 3(11). https://reandpub.uz/nine/article/view/1368

Библиографические ссылки

Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso Books, pp. 33–39.

Enloe, C. (2000). pp. 19–25.

International Labor Organization (ILO). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work (2018). https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_633135/

Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). Women in national parliaments. https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/infographics/2025-03/women-in-national-parliaments

Mill, J.S. (1869). The Subjection of Women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, pp. 45–50.

OECD. Closing the Gender Pay Gap. https://www.oecd.org/gender/

Scott, J. W. (1986). pp. 1053–1057.

Shepherd, L. J. (2010). Gender Matters in Global Politics, p. 6.

Smith, S. (2018, January 4). Introducing feminism in international relations theory. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/04/feminism-in-international-relations-theory/

UN Women. Facts and figures: Ending violence against women. https://www.unwomen.org/

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Report 2023/2024: Breaking the Gridlock: Reimagining Cooperation in a Polarized World (Gender Inequality Index section). https://hdr.undp.org/

United Nations (UN). Security Council / UN Reports on conflict-related sexual violence. https://www.un.org/

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Out-of-school children and youth data. https://uis.unesco.org/

UNFPA. State of World Population / Family planning needs. https://www.unfpa.org/

UNICEF. Child marriage and education facts & figures. https://www.unicef.org/

World Bank. Gender Data Portal / Gender Equality & Economic Opportunity. https://genderdata.worldbank.org/

World Economic Forum (2023). Global Gender Gap Report 2023. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf

World Health Organization (WHO). Violence against women prevalence estimates. https://www.who.int/